Review process

Review methodology

How clarity, accuracy, structure, and usability are checked before and after publication.

Review methodology

What gets reviewed before publication

  • Whether the title matches the actual problem solved on the page.
  • Whether the guide names the official screen, record, or support path a reader should verify.
  • Whether headings lead the reader through the decision in the right order.
  • Whether examples, checklists, and links add practical value instead of repeating the introduction.
  • Whether the page remains readable on mobile without losing key information.

What gets reviewed after publication

Published pages may be revised when a better example becomes available, when a heading order can be improved, when a link needs correction, or when the language can be made easier to follow. Updates focus on clarity and usability first, especially for pages that readers are likely to open while under pressure.

The site also checks whether category pages, search results, and related guides still connect readers to the next useful step. Review is not limited to paragraph wording; it also includes navigation and page structure.

Review checklist

The site checks title clarity, internal-link relevance, readability on smaller screens, trust-page visibility, and whether the page shows readers where independent confirmation should come from.